Considering New Site - Crestock.com

May 29th, 2007 by Lee Torrens

In recent correspondence with one of the top microstock contributors, he queried why I wasn’t using Crestock. He said he was generating double the amount of revenue with them than with some of the other microstock agencies I was using. A referral from one of the industries top performers carries a lot of weight so I took a closer look.

CrestockCrestock were a website I’d heard about in my online travels, but I had assumed they were in the third-tier trying to break into the second. With this recommendation and direct favorable comparison to some of my second-tier microstock agencies, I’ve adjusted my perception. Here’s the details:

Website Crestock.com
Web Address www.crestock.com
Google Pagerank 5
Google Backlinks 8,960
Alexa Rank 21,267
Image Stats Not found
Minimum Image Size 2400 x 1600
Vectors Yes: EPS, AI & Flash
Footage No
Licenses Only standard Royalty Free
Compensation 20% for credit sales (rises to 30% after 100 sales), or $0.25 for subscription sales
Pricing Single images (from $5), subscriptions, and credits
Payment Methods PayPal, Moneybookers & Check
Payment Delay Information unavailable
Referral Program None
Application Process None. Just start contributing.
Exclusivity Not offered
Upload Methods HTML, Flash and FTP
IPTC Data Yes
Currencies US Dollars
Languages English
Headquarters Norway

My Comments on Crestock

Crestock have a nice website. All of the usual features are there in a clear and clean layout. Their upload process is great. I was able to upload 23 images in no time and was always clear of where I was in the process and what was next. There are no upload limits.

I’m keen on referral programs and Crestock don’t have one.

Conclusion

It’s a forgone conclusion as I’ve already signed up. I uploaded 23 of my best images using their very impressive upload process. 22 were rejected. By their own admission Crestock reject a lot of photos that other microstock agencies don’t, and they weren’t kidding. Not being a highly skilled photographer I can take the rejection for what it is and use it as motivation to improve my skills and knowledge. For microstockers with good portfolios, Crestock is a good option. This is still largely based on the recommendation I mentioned above in terms of earnings performance. In terms of their website and processes, they’ve done some excellent work. In terms of their profile and exposure online, they’re still second tier. Let’s watch and see if they can climb.




Tags: , ,

7 Comments »

pdtnc on 2007-05-30 15:54:22

I’m going to try out here, if…. I can get something accepted! (I’m still waiting)
ImageVortex is another site I’m going to test the water with but so far they have rejected images that everywhere else has accepted.
So thats going to be kinda ‘watch this space’ :D

pdtnc :)

 

[...] 21. That’s 16% approved. We started with our top selling photos and are working our way down. Crestock are clearly very stringent in their review [...]

 
Mary B. on 2008-03-17 18:53:27

I uploaded 20 vectors and accompanying jpegs to Crestock over three weeks ago. They accepted the jpegs and they’re now for sale; however, the vectors are not available. Last week I wrote to them asking why my vectors haven’t been approved and I’ve yet to receive a reply. Also, their forum has been down since February 2008. I give up.

 
claudio on 2008-06-21 18:18:30

I submitted about 400 pictures (the best part of my portfolio in my opinion) and only 48 were accepted - that’s 12%. While it makes sense to have strict rules for sites that really sell such as istock, I think I will not waste my bandwidth and time anymore on crestock.

 
David on 2008-07-31 14:32:09

I just submitted four images - 100% rejected. All have been accepted by other agencies.

 
Gav on 2008-10-28 09:46:45

I’ve been pretty lucky on acceptance rate - about 90% for 70 images. But inspection is very slow, and sales are disappointing - less than $10 in 7 months and the lowest revenue per image of any site. Based on these figures, I should reach the $50 minimum payout in about 2 years.

Forum hasn’t worked since February 08, and promises to reintroduce it by August have not been met. It’s a shame, it’s a good looking site but seems to have the activity of a back waters morgue. Don’t think I will waste anymore time uploading.

Dave on 2008-11-03 18:15:44

3 out of 5 images rejected … 2 of those images have sold over 500 times between them on Shutterstock. Bye bye Crestock - waste of time.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Website
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.