<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feeding the Microstock Beast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html</link>
	<description>For People Selling Photos Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zbynek</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-19047</link>
		<dc:creator>Zbynek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-19047</guid>
		<description>I also dont understand &quot;spaming pics&quot; and why the editors let this happen. Unfortunately keyword spaming is probably worst issue on microstock, just randomly search anything on SS and you get at least 50% of completely unwanted stuff with obvious keyword-spam. The situation isnt much better on other sites, maybe IS is slightly better.

I havent uploaded to SS about 6 weeks and the sales go down very rapidly. I have portfolio of about 200 pics on SS, now uploading irregularly but at least twice a month and it still seems there is lot of random sales. You need to push much much more to get usefull numbers, I bet 10-20 pics a week are minimum to keep sales going. So those talks about &quot;passive income&quot;, &quot;investment&quot; etc. are simply lies. 
However DT seems to wake up after few months of slow uploads and sales are rising. The best performer is IS, where the sales are going up with portfolio size and irregular uploads or month delay doesnt seem to have any influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also dont understand &#8220;spaming pics&#8221; and why the editors let this happen. Unfortunately keyword spaming is probably worst issue on microstock, just randomly search anything on SS and you get at least 50% of completely unwanted stuff with obvious keyword-spam. The situation isnt much better on other sites, maybe IS is slightly better.</p>
<p>I havent uploaded to SS about 6 weeks and the sales go down very rapidly. I have portfolio of about 200 pics on SS, now uploading irregularly but at least twice a month and it still seems there is lot of random sales. You need to push much much more to get usefull numbers, I bet 10-20 pics a week are minimum to keep sales going. So those talks about &#8220;passive income&#8221;, &#8220;investment&#8221; etc. are simply lies.<br />
However DT seems to wake up after few months of slow uploads and sales are rising. The best performer is IS, where the sales are going up with portfolio size and irregular uploads or month delay doesnt seem to have any influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18656</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18656</guid>
		<description>I recently took a month or so off and I agree... sales dropped, especially at ShutterStock, back to the point of an occasional &quot;0&quot; day... ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently took a month or so off and I agree&#8230; sales dropped, especially at ShutterStock, back to the point of an occasional &#8220;0&#8243; day&#8230; ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18649</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18649</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the perspective, anonymous reviewer. I can understand beginners using agencies this way in order to learn what is &#039;marketable stock&#039;, but beyond a few submissions, I agree it&#039;s spammy. 

I would expect most agencies include metrics in their search algorithms that penalize portfolios with too many images with low sales. This way, spamming their portfolio works against the contributor. I know some agencies do this.

-Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the perspective, anonymous reviewer. I can understand beginners using agencies this way in order to learn what is &#8216;marketable stock&#8217;, but beyond a few submissions, I agree it&#8217;s spammy. </p>
<p>I would expect most agencies include metrics in their search algorithms that penalize portfolios with too many images with low sales. This way, spamming their portfolio works against the contributor. I know some agencies do this.</p>
<p>-Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diversify</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18630</link>
		<dc:creator>Diversify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18630</guid>
		<description>Feeding the beast.. yes, that is part of the job. But.. many photographers do not understand this, The beast do not like spam, he throws up on it. What i mean is photographers who are uploading tons of very similar images. This is actually the biggest work for the reviewers, not rejecting bad quality, but rejecting what could be thought as photographers spamming their own portfolios. They do what they can so this situation wont be thrown at the customers. 

We all take a lot of very similar images, most of them deleted directly in camera, but many comes in our computers, where we take a closer look to see wch one is the keeper. Many times we do have a hard time deciding which one is the best shot, this is where so many photographers fail, they upload all of them, leaving the work to decide to others. But what are they saying doing that? They say by that behaving that they are not competent deciding even over their own images! Imagine to wade through 38 shots of the same scene, to pick out the best one of them, and that there are 300 cases of the same mess every week, thats 11400 images, per week! Well, it is a lot easier to reject them all when a bunch of similar thumbnails appear. Followed by a &quot;damn spammer&quot; thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feeding the beast.. yes, that is part of the job. But.. many photographers do not understand this, The beast do not like spam, he throws up on it. What i mean is photographers who are uploading tons of very similar images. This is actually the biggest work for the reviewers, not rejecting bad quality, but rejecting what could be thought as photographers spamming their own portfolios. They do what they can so this situation wont be thrown at the customers. </p>
<p>We all take a lot of very similar images, most of them deleted directly in camera, but many comes in our computers, where we take a closer look to see wch one is the keeper. Many times we do have a hard time deciding which one is the best shot, this is where so many photographers fail, they upload all of them, leaving the work to decide to others. But what are they saying doing that? They say by that behaving that they are not competent deciding even over their own images! Imagine to wade through 38 shots of the same scene, to pick out the best one of them, and that there are 300 cases of the same mess every week, thats 11400 images, per week! Well, it is a lot easier to reject them all when a bunch of similar thumbnails appear. Followed by a &#8220;damn spammer&#8221; thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18625</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18625</guid>
		<description>Hi lee

This is an interesting article you have written. I agree with most of it. However, with my experience it took only 1 month to drop to 50%! lmao.

I am a big believer of feeding the beast too. You do totally get out what you put in. I must say also that i found with regular uploading the sales increase expenentially.

How do i make sure my images are timeless? I never thought about it before reading this. I have a variety of images in my ports which seem to cover some of the seasons throughout the year but there is MUCH more to be done yet.

Just 2 cents from a guy with a 345 image gallery.

Steven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi lee</p>
<p>This is an interesting article you have written. I agree with most of it. However, with my experience it took only 1 month to drop to 50%! lmao.</p>
<p>I am a big believer of feeding the beast too. You do totally get out what you put in. I must say also that i found with regular uploading the sales increase expenentially.</p>
<p>How do i make sure my images are timeless? I never thought about it before reading this. I have a variety of images in my ports which seem to cover some of the seasons throughout the year but there is MUCH more to be done yet.</p>
<p>Just 2 cents from a guy with a 345 image gallery.</p>
<p>Steven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian P. Gadal</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18569</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian P. Gadal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18569</guid>
		<description>Passive and Income just don&#039;t seem to go together.  I spend at least 20+ hours a week, shooting, processing, key wording and uploading.  It&#039;s something I like to do, so I don&#039;t mind, but what I find is that the more you put into it, the more you get out of it.

Nice article, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passive and Income just don&#8217;t seem to go together.  I spend at least 20+ hours a week, shooting, processing, key wording and uploading.  It&#8217;s something I like to do, so I don&#8217;t mind, but what I find is that the more you put into it, the more you get out of it.</p>
<p>Nice article, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18535</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18535</guid>
		<description>9 months ago I saw microstock as a sort of investment - portfolio bringing a passive income ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 months ago I saw microstock as a sort of investment &#8211; portfolio bringing a passive income &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perrush</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/feeding-the-microstock-beast.html/comment-page-1#comment-18507</link>
		<dc:creator>Perrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=294#comment-18507</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,

tnx for that link to my article :o)  

I got today a notice my name was used on a site (google alerts), so I came to check it out. Seems google crawls your site pretty fast, always a good sign.  

Greetz
Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>tnx for that link to my article <img src='http://www.microstockdiaries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )  </p>
<p>I got today a notice my name was used on a site (google alerts), so I came to check it out. Seems google crawls your site pretty fast, always a good sign.  </p>
<p>Greetz<br />
Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

