<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fotolia Optimization Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html</link>
	<description>For People Selling Photos Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prenajom chaty</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/comment-page-1#comment-43255</link>
		<dc:creator>Prenajom chaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html#comment-43255</guid>
		<description>Intersting article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intersting article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/comment-page-1#comment-27833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html#comment-27833</guid>
		<description>See my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microstockdiaries.com/microstock-earnings-report-december-2007.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;December 2007 earnings report&lt;/a&gt; for the results François.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my <a href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/microstock-earnings-report-december-2007.html" rel="nofollow">December 2007 earnings report</a> for the results François.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: François</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/comment-page-1#comment-27831</link>
		<dc:creator>François</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html#comment-27831</guid>
		<description>what about the result ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the result ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkFGD</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/comment-page-1#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkFGD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>I started submitting images to Fotolia fairly recently. My first images were accepted last month. To me, the number of views on most files seems low, however, the number of downloads in relation to these views is quite good. So far, I have 75 approved images and 41 downloads -- nothing to shout about but proof that the site works. Some files have been viewed about 30 times while others haven&#039;t been viewed at all, but I reckon this is more to do with subject matter and less to do with a poor search engine. Fotolia isn&#039;t a bad site -- the approval times are quick, the acceptance/rejection criteria is reasonably consistent and downloads are steady (at least, that&#039;s what I&#039;m finding). I&#039;m betting your downloads will increase after your keywords are prioritised. Let&#039;s hope so. I too look forward to seeing your next month&#039;s stats.

Best regards.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started submitting images to Fotolia fairly recently. My first images were accepted last month. To me, the number of views on most files seems low, however, the number of downloads in relation to these views is quite good. So far, I have 75 approved images and 41 downloads &#8212; nothing to shout about but proof that the site works. Some files have been viewed about 30 times while others haven&#8217;t been viewed at all, but I reckon this is more to do with subject matter and less to do with a poor search engine. Fotolia isn&#8217;t a bad site &#8212; the approval times are quick, the acceptance/rejection criteria is reasonably consistent and downloads are steady (at least, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m finding). I&#8217;m betting your downloads will increase after your keywords are prioritised. Let&#8217;s hope so. I too look forward to seeing your next month&#8217;s stats.</p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html/comment-page-1#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/fotolia-optimization-experiment.html#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>It is a good experiment to do but I am not sure you will be able to say something because of the large variation in sales at FT. I wonder sometime how buyers are finding pictures there with such a poor search engine. Anyway look forward to see your November stats
Laurent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good experiment to do but I am not sure you will be able to say something because of the large variation in sales at FT. I wonder sometime how buyers are finding pictures there with such a poor search engine. Anyway look forward to see your November stats<br />
Laurent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

