Comments on: Shutterstock

By: Shoomsthesype

Shoomsthesype — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:47 +0000

lg flatron f700b драйвер

фильм кровь и шоколад

алгебра алимов 11 класс

3gp мама и сын

химия 11 класс новошинский

keygen для фотошопа cs4

драйвер geforce gt 230

минусовка ротару луна луна

parasite eve 2 торрент

песню из фильма суперневестка

песню распутиной и киркорова

By: Lee Torrens

Lee Torrens — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:02:02 +0000

Thanks Ann, updated.

By: ann

ann — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:45:21 +0000

Hi Lee – re Payout box info: contributor may request $75 automatic payout limit

By: Lee Torrens

Lee Torrens — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:45:52 +0000

Thanks zrmedia and Charles for the conversation. I’ll leave these comments online in the name of open discussion, but I don’t want to encourage comments getting personal as in these two. So let’s let this particular conversation end here (i.e. responses to these comments won’t be published).
Thanks.
-Lee

By: Charles

Charles — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:39:29 +0000

zrmedia has lied throughout his comments. First, SS didn’t delete his comments. They’re still there and the real submitters are having a good laugh. He thinks they’re not there because he’s too stupid to find them. He also said that he could get past any forum ban. This is doubtful since it’s obvious that he can’t even follow simple directions for submitting. He posted the same “paragraph” twice in the same post because he can’t figure out how to use Word properly so it’s pretty doubtful he has the expertise to get past a forum ban. He’s just one of those people that can’t follow directions and then when he gets mad he blames everyone but himself (like a small child). He, in fact, did NOT have the images resubmitted by a friend. He also claims that he has THOUSANDS of videos to upload but refuses to post a link so the submitters at SS can see those thousands of videos. If he really had thousands, he’d know the routine by now and he would have followed the directions and he’d be making money now. Instead, he’s chosen to fabricate a few stories and blame the world for his inadequacies as a photographer/videographer/human.

Shutterstock IS difficult to get into, but once you’re in, you can make some really good money if you think, learn, remain open to change and criticism, and work hard.

By: zrmedia

zrmedia — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:25:01 +0000

Shutterstock is the bottom of the barrel. It’s the most arrogant stock site out there, which would be expected if it wasn’t also the worst stock site out there. I conducted an experiment after reading some negative comments about SS to see if it was worth my time to sign up: I uploaded 10 images. 4 were rejected for very vague reasons (they claim to make these reasons clear so that newcomers can learn from their mistakes, but no such luck.) The most arrogant thing about the site is that they make submitters wait an entire month before they can submit another 10 photos. This makes absolutely no sense and totally justifies all the negative things I’ve read about the site. So a month later, I submitted the exact same 10 photos. This time, 5 were rejected and 3 of the accepted ones had been rejected the first time!!! This proves that they have no set standards and whether you get accepted or not depends entirely on which reviewer you get and his/her mood on that day. Also, I have thousands of photos that I gave file names to for submission to other sites, and when I finally got accepted at ShutterStock and attempted my first batch upload, it failed due to a “critical upload error”. I looked for the problem in the forum and discovered that there can’t be any spaces in the filename or the transfer will fail. So I would have to rename thousands of files to upload them. All this trouble and you only make $0.25-$0.30 per photo. I posted my own comment about how ridiculous this was and my comment was deleted within ten minutes. This level of arrogance is unheard of and I can’t believe there is even one positive review of ShutterStock anywhere. Trust me, folks, don’t waste your time.

By: HangItShop

HangItShop — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:16:09 +0000

Submitted my 10 test pictures last evening. Woke up to an email saying that all 10 got approved. Guess time to upload some more
I’m really excited about finding out soon how much money I will be able to make with them.

By: Timi Ke

Timi Ke — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:58:52 +0000

Yeah, it depends on program, of corse. The price of AI and PS is affordable. But the price of 3ds max (the best program to prepare my illustrations) is huge, too much just for a hobby (

By: Lee Torrens

Lee Torrens — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:16:50 +0000

Timi, this depends on a lot of factors including what file types you will upload and which programs. To my knowledge there’s no indication in the files about whether the software used to make them is properly licensed or not, although I know some ‘trial versions’ include a visible watermark on the file.
There are lots of great free license solutions which do a great job. GIMP is one example for photo editing. These solutions are a great way to use legal software until you can afford to choose any solution.
-Lee

By: Timi Ke

Timi Ke — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:04:59 +0000

Hi, my question is, that if I would like upload some works which was made in programs without license? Can it be a problem?