<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapVillage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html</link>
	<description>For People Selling Photos Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: microstockphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-22325</link>
		<dc:creator>microstockphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-22325</guid>
		<description>I am tented to upload at Snapvillage since Corbis should guarantee that they don&#039;t fail and will eventually succeed.

But until they don&#039;t offer FTP and &#039;proper&#039; IPTC keywords* it&#039;s not worth the time in my opinion.

*there are many different styles in IPTC synthax and they only accept comma separated words, while semicolumn separated or one per line are not working</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tented to upload at Snapvillage since Corbis should guarantee that they don&#8217;t fail and will eventually succeed.</p>
<p>But until they don&#8217;t offer FTP and &#8216;proper&#8217; IPTC keywords* it&#8217;s not worth the time in my opinion.</p>
<p>*there are many different styles in IPTC synthax and they only accept comma separated words, while semicolumn separated or one per line are not working</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kazmercyk</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-10705</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kazmercyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-10705</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee: Thanks for the great site. A real help to me being an amateur trying to learn in my spare time.

Well, it&#039;s been ten months (time actually does fly!) and I just wandered back to this post. About a month ago (roughly April 2008) I decided to give SnapVillage another try. The first thing I discovered after much trial and error was that it was impossible to complete the upload process at all using Mac Safari (probably v3.1.x). So, I decided to give give Firefox a whirl (currently v2.0.0.14) and that made all the difference. However, the upload process is tedious as it&#039;s an HTTP-based system allowing only five images at a time. That in and of itself is not horrible, but I discovered that if I let the upload go, switch to an app to get some work done, then go back, there&#039;s a great danger of the session timing out with me needing to start the process from scratch. So now I find myself continually checking switching from whatever Adobe app I&#039;m working in back to Firefox every few minutes to be sure I don&#039;t time out.

I had occasion to contact SnapVillage about an issue and although it took probably two weeks, they responded and actually asked me some questions about the upload process, how I might feel about alternate upload methods, etc. (which I thought was nice of them to do). My response was that anything browser-based is tedious and ties up the browser, so FTP would be far preferable.

Anyway, while it seems a bit a risk at this point to invest a huge amount of time uploading to an as-yet unproven site (they are still in &quot;beta&quot;) I&#039;ve got about 50 images accepted with a grand total of 1 download at $0.30.

Also on the upside--for my ego--is that they seem to accept pretty much whatever is uploaded. I haven&#039;t determined yet if that will change and how it might ultimately reflect on the overall perception of quality on the site, but it&#039;s nice for now to only get acceptance notices.

I&#039;ll post back again. Hopefully it won&#039;t be 10 more months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee: Thanks for the great site. A real help to me being an amateur trying to learn in my spare time.</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s been ten months (time actually does fly!) and I just wandered back to this post. About a month ago (roughly April 2008) I decided to give SnapVillage another try. The first thing I discovered after much trial and error was that it was impossible to complete the upload process at all using Mac Safari (probably v3.1.x). So, I decided to give give Firefox a whirl (currently v2.0.0.14) and that made all the difference. However, the upload process is tedious as it&#8217;s an HTTP-based system allowing only five images at a time. That in and of itself is not horrible, but I discovered that if I let the upload go, switch to an app to get some work done, then go back, there&#8217;s a great danger of the session timing out with me needing to start the process from scratch. So now I find myself continually checking switching from whatever Adobe app I&#8217;m working in back to Firefox every few minutes to be sure I don&#8217;t time out.</p>
<p>I had occasion to contact SnapVillage about an issue and although it took probably two weeks, they responded and actually asked me some questions about the upload process, how I might feel about alternate upload methods, etc. (which I thought was nice of them to do). My response was that anything browser-based is tedious and ties up the browser, so FTP would be far preferable.</p>
<p>Anyway, while it seems a bit a risk at this point to invest a huge amount of time uploading to an as-yet unproven site (they are still in &#8220;beta&#8221;) I&#8217;ve got about 50 images accepted with a grand total of 1 download at $0.30.</p>
<p>Also on the upside&#8211;for my ego&#8211;is that they seem to accept pretty much whatever is uploaded. I haven&#8217;t determined yet if that will change and how it might ultimately reflect on the overall perception of quality on the site, but it&#8217;s nice for now to only get acceptance notices.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post back again. Hopefully it won&#8217;t be 10 more months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Torres</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ditto my friend ditto !!!! Now if only I could use this blog as an ad to motivate them to fix that beta&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto my friend ditto !!!! Now if only I could use this blog as an ad to motivate them to fix that beta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kazmercyk</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kazmercyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I should also add that there doesn&#039;t appear to be any way of seeing and/or confirming what you&#039;ve uploaded. In other words, I can&#039;t confirm that my images have been successfully uploaded, nor do I have any sort of queue to see what&#039;s waiting for review. This all seems like terribly basic stuff for Corbis to have missed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add that there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any way of seeing and/or confirming what you&#8217;ve uploaded. In other words, I can&#8217;t confirm that my images have been successfully uploaded, nor do I have any sort of queue to see what&#8217;s waiting for review. This all seems like terribly basic stuff for Corbis to have missed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kazmercyk</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kazmercyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Well, my experience with SnapVillage has so far been plagued with problems. First of all, they don&#039;t parse the metadata tags so even the most basic info (title and description) and the most critical data (tags!) aren&#039;t automatically populated as they are in all the other major sites, which means everything needs to be copied and pasted into individual fields for every image. I have also experienced several timeout errors with their server. I just spent time doing all the above-mentioned copying and pasting, only to get a database error which requires me to start all over. I would have thought that a big bucks company like Corbis could do a lot better than this. I realize it&#039;s still technically &quot;beta&quot; but it&#039;s not a great start from my point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my experience with SnapVillage has so far been plagued with problems. First of all, they don&#8217;t parse the metadata tags so even the most basic info (title and description) and the most critical data (tags!) aren&#8217;t automatically populated as they are in all the other major sites, which means everything needs to be copied and pasted into individual fields for every image. I have also experienced several timeout errors with their server. I just spent time doing all the above-mentioned copying and pasting, only to get a database error which requires me to start all over. I would have thought that a big bucks company like Corbis could do a lot better than this. I realize it&#8217;s still technically &#8220;beta&#8221; but it&#8217;s not a great start from my point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ishmael, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, I considered creating a forum but there already exist a few excellent forums on the topic of microstock. Seek them out and sign up. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microstockgroup.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microstock Group&lt;/a&gt; in particular has a very vibrant and helpful community. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Lee&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ishmael, </p>
<p>Yes, I considered creating a forum but there already exist a few excellent forums on the topic of microstock. Seek them out and sign up. <a href="http://www.microstockgroup.com" rel="nofollow">Microstock Group</a> in particular has a very vibrant and helpful community. </p>
<p>- Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishmael Greenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishmael Greenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Lee Torrens,

Thanks for your response. I&#039;m still waiting. Have you thought about adding a forum section to this blog? It seems that with your design as it stands right now, we can only really comment on news that you have posted. Plus I think it would nice to have all our posts in one area (not that I have that many yet, just a thought).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Torrens,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response. I&#8217;m still waiting. Have you thought about adding a forum section to this blog? It seems that with your design as it stands right now, we can only really comment on news that you have posted. Plus I think it would nice to have all our posts in one area (not that I have that many yet, just a thought).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Hi Ishmael, 

I haven&#039;t had any photos reviewed at SnapVillage yet either. They generated a lot of publicity with their launch so they&#039;ve been swamped with submissions. They&#039;re hiring extra reviewers to help get the queue under control. 

Review times go up and down at all websites. Some show you the number of photos in their queue so you can get an idea of the wait times. Sometimes you can be lucky and have your photos reviewed immediately, even before you&#039;ve finished keywording the next one! It all depends. We tend to submit and forget, focussing our attention on creating and uploading more images.

Be sure to let us know how you go with SnapVillage! 

- Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ishmael, </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had any photos reviewed at SnapVillage yet either. They generated a lot of publicity with their launch so they&#8217;ve been swamped with submissions. They&#8217;re hiring extra reviewers to help get the queue under control. </p>
<p>Review times go up and down at all websites. Some show you the number of photos in their queue so you can get an idea of the wait times. Sometimes you can be lucky and have your photos reviewed immediately, even before you&#8217;ve finished keywording the next one! It all depends. We tend to submit and forget, focussing our attention on creating and uploading more images.</p>
<p>Be sure to let us know how you go with SnapVillage! </p>
<p>- Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishmael Greenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishmael Greenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for posting about snapvillage on your blog. If you hadn&#039;t done so, I wouldn&#039;t have been any the wiser. I submitted 4 of my best photos 2 days ago and still haven&#039;t gotten a review back. I&#039;d like to ask the author of this blog as well as the regular contributers how long it&#039;s taken you (assuming some of you are already contributing). I&#039;ve found that Fotolia (V1, that is) was the quickest on review turnaround time, while all the other sites take quite some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for posting about snapvillage on your blog. If you hadn&#8217;t done so, I wouldn&#8217;t have been any the wiser. I submitted 4 of my best photos 2 days ago and still haven&#8217;t gotten a review back. I&#8217;d like to ask the author of this blog as well as the regular contributers how long it&#8217;s taken you (assuming some of you are already contributing). I&#8217;ve found that Fotolia (V1, that is) was the quickest on review turnaround time, while all the other sites take quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darlumpus</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html/comment-page-1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Darlumpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/snapvillage.html#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I was thinking since they were Corbis they&#039;d be much more picky. Maybe I&#039;ll try them out, too. Thanx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I was thinking since they were Corbis they&#8217;d be much more picky. Maybe I&#8217;ll try them out, too. Thanx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

