<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Month in Microstock &#8211; December 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html</link>
	<description>For People Selling Photos Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Tuomi</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52865</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Tuomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52865</guid>
		<description>Natalia is the only artist/business supplier I have had to ban while doing business online since 1991.

At first we thought it was some secret &quot;Extra Rudeness&quot; checkbox in the Google Translate she is using to communicate, however it is clear she is among the most unprofessional and sociopathic people I have had the displeasure of dealing with. A classic indicator as to why agencies are giving sellers less and less, brave people behind computer screens who treat small businesses like some people treat Government Services Office employees - people that are just their to serve them and receive abuse. 

I&#039;ll give you a hint: &quot;the customer is always right&quot; does not apply to suppliers and business partners.

We tried to avoid having a call-center approach to member relations and unfortunately the extreme minority of people like Natalia (well, just her basically) seem to thrive on the fact they can get a real, live reaction from putting people down.

Upon having enough of her unprofessional conduct, we temporarily suspended her account and and paid out the $4.90 owed to her. This did was simply a suspension, maintaining her portfolio and expended effort until such time that she could act like an adult and stop calling our staff names. She immediately posted on the Microstockgroup that we &quot;closed her account&quot; and that we are &quot;defaming&quot; her - a pretty great charge as she is the one who published the (misleading) info.

If you enjoy swearing, insults, false bug reports, arguments about image review decisons, etc. then I highly recommend letting this woman &quot;contribute&quot; to your agency.

Natalia, I may remind you that while Zymmetrical &quot;the site&quot; is gone, the business continues. If you would like a no-expenses paid trip to Beautiful British Columbia, to answer charges of libel in the provincial court, you can continue on your personal vendetta to poison every reference regarding Zymmetrical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natalia is the only artist/business supplier I have had to ban while doing business online since 1991.</p>
<p>At first we thought it was some secret &#8220;Extra Rudeness&#8221; checkbox in the Google Translate she is using to communicate, however it is clear she is among the most unprofessional and sociopathic people I have had the displeasure of dealing with. A classic indicator as to why agencies are giving sellers less and less, brave people behind computer screens who treat small businesses like some people treat Government Services Office employees &#8211; people that are just their to serve them and receive abuse. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint: &#8220;the customer is always right&#8221; does not apply to suppliers and business partners.</p>
<p>We tried to avoid having a call-center approach to member relations and unfortunately the extreme minority of people like Natalia (well, just her basically) seem to thrive on the fact they can get a real, live reaction from putting people down.</p>
<p>Upon having enough of her unprofessional conduct, we temporarily suspended her account and and paid out the $4.90 owed to her. This did was simply a suspension, maintaining her portfolio and expended effort until such time that she could act like an adult and stop calling our staff names. She immediately posted on the Microstockgroup that we &#8220;closed her account&#8221; and that we are &#8220;defaming&#8221; her &#8211; a pretty great charge as she is the one who published the (misleading) info.</p>
<p>If you enjoy swearing, insults, false bug reports, arguments about image review decisons, etc. then I highly recommend letting this woman &#8220;contribute&#8221; to your agency.</p>
<p>Natalia, I may remind you that while Zymmetrical &#8220;the site&#8221; is gone, the business continues. If you would like a no-expenses paid trip to Beautiful British Columbia, to answer charges of libel in the provincial court, you can continue on your personal vendetta to poison every reference regarding Zymmetrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serban Enache</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52477</link>
		<dc:creator>Serban Enache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52477</guid>
		<description>Krysztof, no posts were moderated in the thread and the feedback was 100% positive. The royalties adjustment was done in fall 2009.

While the royalty cut was done gradually in order to avoid any impact, this latest news represents an increase in royalties (thanks to the levels update). Lee already commented this in his article. If you want me to clarify anything feel free to leave a comment to any of my photos. 

Official thread here: http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_19813</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krysztof, no posts were moderated in the thread and the feedback was 100% positive. The royalties adjustment was done in fall 2009.</p>
<p>While the royalty cut was done gradually in order to avoid any impact, this latest news represents an increase in royalties (thanks to the levels update). Lee already commented this in his article. If you want me to clarify anything feel free to leave a comment to any of my photos. </p>
<p>Official thread here: <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_19813" rel="nofollow">http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_19813</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52422</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52422</guid>
		<description>On their forum DT has stated that the new credits pricing will come into effect next week.  I am particularily pleased that many of my photos will be elevated to level 3 &amp; 4 status, and that I should see a lot more means subs paying 70 cents and up.  Sure beats 25 cents :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On their forum DT has stated that the new credits pricing will come into effect next week.  I am particularily pleased that many of my photos will be elevated to level 3 &amp; 4 status, and that I should see a lot more means subs paying 70 cents and up.  Sure beats 25 cents <img src='http://www.microstockdiaries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52369</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52369</guid>
		<description>No, the current commissions range from 30% to 50%, but yes, they have been lowered.  However, at the same time, prices were raised and the levels changed so that images earn more with fewer sales.  Plus, Dreamstime still pay the highest commissions and are the only agency to allow individual photos to earn more, not specific photographers/portfolios.  I totally understand people get upset with changes like this, but I think you time would be more productive protesting agencies who are less generous than Dreamstime. 

Regarding the removal of negative forum comments - I totally understand this. It&#039;s their business and their customers see those comments too.  There are independent forums where you can speak freely about the agencies, but doing so on the agency&#039;s own forum just isn&#039;t cool, in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the current commissions range from 30% to 50%, but yes, they have been lowered.  However, at the same time, prices were raised and the levels changed so that images earn more with fewer sales.  Plus, Dreamstime still pay the highest commissions and are the only agency to allow individual photos to earn more, not specific photographers/portfolios.  I totally understand people get upset with changes like this, but I think you time would be more productive protesting agencies who are less generous than Dreamstime. </p>
<p>Regarding the removal of negative forum comments &#8211; I totally understand this. It&#8217;s their business and their customers see those comments too.  There are independent forums where you can speak freely about the agencies, but doing so on the agency&#8217;s own forum just isn&#8217;t cool, in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52366</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52366</guid>
		<description>Regarding Dreamstime, contributors commission was LOWERED from 50% to 30%. Many contributors, included me, were not happy about it. The problem is that only &quot;positive&quot; comments stay on DT forum, others are deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Dreamstime, contributors commission was LOWERED from 50% to 30%. Many contributors, included me, were not happy about it. The problem is that only &#8220;positive&#8221; comments stay on DT forum, others are deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/this-month-in-microstock-december-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-52270</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=1042#comment-52270</guid>
		<description>Regarding Zymmetrical, it is necessary to point out, that they were more concentrated on adding more crappy functionality to their web-site rather than on attracting buyers. Yet another LuckyOliver-like failure because of pretty irresponsible attitude to business in general and in particular to contributors who spent their time on struggling with new bugs that appeared after each update of the interface (happened regularly each ~1-2 months). No regret. Good riddance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Zymmetrical, it is necessary to point out, that they were more concentrated on adding more crappy functionality to their web-site rather than on attracting buyers. Yet another LuckyOliver-like failure because of pretty irresponsible attitude to business in general and in particular to contributors who spent their time on struggling with new bugs that appeared after each update of the interface (happened regularly each ~1-2 months). No regret. Good riddance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

