<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UGCX in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html</link>
	<description>For People Selling Photos Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john lund</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27809</link>
		<dc:creator>john lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27809</guid>
		<description>Lee,


Great show...thanks for making it happen!  The show felt very intimate...and being in such close proximity to so much brain power was a kick!  I enjoyed the opportunity to talk with some very successful micro shooters, including Yuri.  I remain convinced that there are still huge opportunities in stock if one stays flexible and informed.  Micro still isn&#039;t for me, but I certainly do not see it as the end of stock...more of an interesting addition.  Right now I see it as an indicator...an indicator that tells us there is a demand for lower priced images, there is no shortage of those willing and able to fill that demand, and that for me to continue my success in stock requires more strategic thinking and business discipline than I have employed before.  The industry continues to grow more fascinating by the moment!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee,</p>
<p>Great show&#8230;thanks for making it happen!  The show felt very intimate&#8230;and being in such close proximity to so much brain power was a kick!  I enjoyed the opportunity to talk with some very successful micro shooters, including Yuri.  I remain convinced that there are still huge opportunities in stock if one stays flexible and informed.  Micro still isn&#8217;t for me, but I certainly do not see it as the end of stock&#8230;more of an interesting addition.  Right now I see it as an indicator&#8230;an indicator that tells us there is a demand for lower priced images, there is no shortage of those willing and able to fill that demand, and that for me to continue my success in stock requires more strategic thinking and business discipline than I have employed before.  The industry continues to grow more fascinating by the moment!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27747</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27747</guid>
		<description>Well Don, I can see why you&#039;re not convinced. 

At the same time as announcing his $1.4million earnings he spoke about keeping his business very close to the line of profitability. But he stressed that this was the result of his intentional heavy re-investment strategy. He added that he only pays himself a salary of US$6k per month. (keep in mind this conversation was in October 2008)

An obvious key strategic advantage in microstock is being able to produce photos cheaply. Yuri calculates the profitability of each of his shoots and knows his numbers well. Still - at least so far - he chooses to work with a large team, shoot with a Hasselblad, and base his business in a very high taxing country (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Denmark&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;up to 62%&lt;/a&gt;). Maybe that&#039;s why he reinvests so heavily - it keeps his profits and subsequently his taxes lower, yet still builds his income level.

Another example is Andres Rodriguez. He shoots with professional models, on location, with a crew and lots of equipment. But he does this in Colombia. He said at UGCX he gets return on investment for each shoot in three months, on average. 

My point is that it&#039;s different for all of us. Large scale microstock production may not be at all feasible for highly capitalized photographers in the US, so I understand why you&#039;re not convinced. But for people in different circumstances, it can be more than feasible. 

We each see microstock from our own perspective, and one is not necessarily more valid than another. I&#039;m not trying to convince you, but just highlighting some alternate perspectives. :)

-Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Don, I can see why you&#8217;re not convinced. </p>
<p>At the same time as announcing his $1.4million earnings he spoke about keeping his business very close to the line of profitability. But he stressed that this was the result of his intentional heavy re-investment strategy. He added that he only pays himself a salary of US$6k per month. (keep in mind this conversation was in October 2008)</p>
<p>An obvious key strategic advantage in microstock is being able to produce photos cheaply. Yuri calculates the profitability of each of his shoots and knows his numbers well. Still &#8211; at least so far &#8211; he chooses to work with a large team, shoot with a Hasselblad, and base his business in a very high taxing country (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Denmark" rel="nofollow">up to 62%</a>). Maybe that&#8217;s why he reinvests so heavily &#8211; it keeps his profits and subsequently his taxes lower, yet still builds his income level.</p>
<p>Another example is Andres Rodriguez. He shoots with professional models, on location, with a crew and lots of equipment. But he does this in Colombia. He said at UGCX he gets return on investment for each shoot in three months, on average. </p>
<p>My point is that it&#8217;s different for all of us. Large scale microstock production may not be at all feasible for highly capitalized photographers in the US, so I understand why you&#8217;re not convinced. But for people in different circumstances, it can be more than feasible. </p>
<p>We each see microstock from our own perspective, and one is not necessarily more valid than another. I&#8217;m not trying to convince you, but just highlighting some alternate perspectives. <img src='http://www.microstockdiaries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nuzzaco</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nuzzaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27746</guid>
		<description>I agree completely Don, net is king.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely Don, net is king.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Farrall</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27745</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Farrall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27745</guid>
		<description>Gross sales matter not, what matters is net.  I remain unconvinced by any numbers I read regarding the large scale production of microstock.

Don Farrall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gross sales matter not, what matters is net.  I remain unconvinced by any numbers I read regarding the large scale production of microstock.</p>
<p>Don Farrall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nuzzaco</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27485</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nuzzaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27485</guid>
		<description>I find the Yuri RPI stats interesting, yet not very revealing. Unless I haven&#039;t heard it all, the RPI numbers given never seem to come with an explanation about the calculation. Is this assuming only images in a given year, or all time? Etc.. I&#039;m still pretty solid in my opinion that any drop he&#039;s had has more to do with a changing content demand, as well as saturation of former high earning subjects which make up a large potion of his portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the Yuri RPI stats interesting, yet not very revealing. Unless I haven&#8217;t heard it all, the RPI numbers given never seem to come with an explanation about the calculation. Is this assuming only images in a given year, or all time? Etc.. I&#8217;m still pretty solid in my opinion that any drop he&#8217;s had has more to do with a changing content demand, as well as saturation of former high earning subjects which make up a large potion of his portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27465</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27465</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee -

Thanks for the write-up - we&#039;ve been so busy it&#039;s a good time to step back and look back at all the good stuff that happened at UGCX.

Great to meet you in San Jose - and many thanks for all your work to help put the show together. 

We had an awesome time - looking forward to the next one! 


- Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee -</p>
<p>Thanks for the write-up &#8211; we&#8217;ve been so busy it&#8217;s a good time to step back and look back at all the good stuff that happened at UGCX.</p>
<p>Great to meet you in San Jose &#8211; and many thanks for all your work to help put the show together. </p>
<p>We had an awesome time &#8211; looking forward to the next one! </p>
<p>- Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27458</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27458</guid>
		<description>Rahul, my understanding was that he meant it&#039;s never been difficult to attract a lot of submissions. From the perspective of iStockphoto that&#039;s obviously the case, though I can point to a few other agencies who have a totally different experience. 

Thanks for your kind words on the event. Don&#039;t believe what I told you previously, it was all worth it in the end!  ;)

-Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahul, my understanding was that he meant it&#8217;s never been difficult to attract a lot of submissions. From the perspective of iStockphoto that&#8217;s obviously the case, though I can point to a few other agencies who have a totally different experience. </p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words on the event. Don&#8217;t believe what I told you previously, it was all worth it in the end!  <img src='http://www.microstockdiaries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27455</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27455</guid>
		<description>Nice summary Lee. I missed Kelly&#039;s quote. Did he mean that there is no lack of images, or did he mean that the abundance of images does not create problems? (Does my question even make sense ?)

PS: You did an amazing job making this show happen and deserve a ton of credit for its success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice summary Lee. I missed Kelly&#8217;s quote. Did he mean that there is no lack of images, or did he mean that the abundance of images does not create problems? (Does my question even make sense ?)</p>
<p>PS: You did an amazing job making this show happen and deserve a ton of credit for its success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27453</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27453</guid>
		<description>Hey John, Yuri announced earnings of US$1.4 million per year last October at PhotoPlus. I asked him during his session at UGCX if he wanted to give an update and he said he won&#039;t be making his income levels public anymore. However, with the RPI figures he did provide you can make a relatively accurate estimate. 

-Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John, Yuri announced earnings of US$1.4 million per year last October at PhotoPlus. I asked him during his session at UGCX if he wanted to give an update and he said he won&#8217;t be making his income levels public anymore. However, with the RPI figures he did provide you can make a relatively accurate estimate. </p>
<p>-Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockdiaries.com/ugcx-in-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-27452</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microstockdiaries.com/?p=329#comment-27452</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt, yep, October in Boston. See you there!

-Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt, yep, October in Boston. See you there!</p>
<p>-Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

